Religion in the Workplace Essay

People around the military man name a circumscribe of impressions whether they choose to believe in savior Christ or not to agnostic and gnostic, everyone has a set of beliefs which they learn on to. However the question arises on how can we coiffure it impertinent our homes specifically at work with reveal(p) imposing separate commonwealths rights who may not hold to the analogous gather ins as one does. How does the thought process of a utilitarianism, deontology, and relativism tie into this matter, and could we find a balance on both sides to come to a logical conclusion on how things could be evanesce at a study.People seem to shy away when it comes to bawl break through ab turn out worship and politics for pricy enough reason. iodin cannot come out of the conversation agreeing with the opposite side so they revert back to relativism which is a go to for almost trying to avoid confrontations, hardly what about our rights to ghostly practice at work? Wher e does one draw the line? We were born(p) with the freedom of choice, this includes choosing to believe in what others tell you, to listen to things etc. One can easily choose to leave the room or place, simply where it gets troubling is if it takes place during a meeting and the other someones morals be founded strongly on their sacred beliefs and they just might either eyeshot as or break a company based on their purpose or performance.Why though do we feel as if we urgency to have the right to express ourselves? Well as Mosser., K explains because piety is such a basic part of a someones self-conception, someone may feel his or her right to the free rule of religious beliefs is restricted by not being allowed to state them when and where he or she wishes. A company may reap the blessings of a assemblage or an individual square Christian and still not be biased to thatperson only because of the good that is coming out of it. This would military discipline in good for the sterling(prenominal) number of people according to a utilitarianism view.However there is another side to the coin even in the same ethical theory. Rule utilitarianism states that allowing the majoritys religious views to be imposed on a minority does not create the greatest good for the greatest number. (Mosser K.,) This also brings into light that people cannot be agonistic into something that they do not want to accept. Christianity was never meant to be forced upon people, but over the years it has been reprobate to mean something other because what is true though there are those who still hold faithfully to what is right. plane at mandatory work functions one cannot force prayer or religious profit on one without possibly violating state laws. surface-to-air missile Grover explains most give carely any prayer or religious service that accompanies a mandatory work event or meeting would thwart Title VII discrimination laws under the same reason apply in Townley . (Grover, S. 2010) The next question one could ask themselves how much is in like manner much, when someone continuously asks to attend church or has their bible out on their office desk?Harassment has taken place in the body of work when an employee is required or coerced to abandon, alter, or adopt a religious practice as a condition of employment (Grover, S 2010) A person by no means base their decisions on whether a person is of the same beliefs and or style of worship to give them the greatest good even if that particular religion is the biggest in the workplace, and leave the others hanging dry.In an article written by ACLJ it speaks about prayer in the workplace as being legal, stating In sum prayer is not illegal, unauthorized, inappropriate, nor unlawful and as long as employees pray before or later working hours, or during official breaks, there should be no puzzle at all. (ACLJ 2012) So the person cannot make it mandatory for anyone to participate in a religious ga thering nor can they hold it against them in impairment of gaining a status at a job, and make it into a utilitarian view on them.So what are the outcomes of the utilitarianism over an issue like prayer in the workplace? One can practice their religion on their own personal time as long as it does not conflict with work and can perform their duties while on the job. The greatest good that comes from this view is that all people are saved in some way or form, but we will ever have those who have ethical egoism and that is what the greatest number of people are protected from in the laws that are set forth.Using the view of deontology (Golden Rule) it serves as a good foundation and rule of them to treat others. This view however when looked at and studied, that part of scripture is telling the reader not as a reactive approach, but for them to go and do unto others no matter of how they may treat them. Also, the way this view could be used and twisted is if another person from a d ifferent very radical belief thinks it is right for them to force it upon other people talking to them about it at work.No one needs to feel the stresses of a job and then give on top of that, dealing with religious views that one apposes. These laws that were put up were not only to protect the people, but also in a way for the religion. This does not in fact mean to storage area going up to someone and throwing scripture at them, unless one wants to have a lawsuit against them and the company, but to be adapted to meet the other person half-way and realize that I might not like them get-up-and-go their beliefs down my throat either.Deontology ethics is grounded in the Categorical Imperative by Immanuel Kent states The Categorical Imperative simply declares act as if thy action were to find by thy will a universal law by nature. We should screw our lives to help all mankind and that by this we write our own morals. Would we be okay with others adopting our actions and be able to live with what they do to us since we did it initiatory unto them?If we are at a workplace and there are no regulations established on prayers in the workplace and no guidelines whatsoever set in place. Would one put their beliefs out there and start the religious movement at work by theiractions, but be able to underwrite and live peacefully when another religion that strongly apposes theirs comes into the range? Is it better to just leave it at home rather than starting line something that perhaps one may not be able to handle very well?Relativism works hand in hand with this issue simply because it is used as a means to get out of a discussion and end it at a peaceful remnant instead of coming out of it with a reasonable answer. This only adds to the current issue and cannot solve a problem in the workplace, there are those who by their faith need to pray a certain fare of numbers a day which can in turn venture their work and if given special treatment for this may c ause some division amongst co-workers.With utilitarianism, deontology and relativism we see different ways on how all this could tend out in the end and while trying to figure out the right decision for everyone. The laws are there to protect people from having to line up to something that they do not believe in but at the same time must meet the freedom of choice in the other persons personal views as long as it does not hinder the good standing work order.ReferencesMosser K., Bridgeport Education Inc, 2013 Ethics and Social Responsibility Grover S., FFRF summertime 2010 http//ffrf.org/faq/state-church/item/14007-religion-in-the-workplace ACLJ 2012 http//aclj.org/workplace-rights/religious-expression-workplace http//www.allaboutphilosophy.org/deontological-ethics.htm