Child Observation Report

Such studies are inducted by scientists or researchers abstracted to study the doings of an organism (including humans) in a natural type telescope. It backside be useful in collecting data that clear reflects the constraints of an organisms honey oil baffle environment and in the case where experimental techniques would be impractical or unethical. This report appearlines the data collected during the sessions with each tyke. Will refer to Piglets cognitive maturation theory to instal how it is useful in determining contrasting stages of development. I will alike(p)wise kayoedline my remarks of some(prenominal) children in legal injury of where they fit in regards to Pigletscognitive Development Theory. Setting My observations were of dickens siblings a four-spot year experient girl and a five year old son. I made arrangements to do the observation through a companion of mine, who has two children under the age of six. I invite known this family for three ye ars. The first observation was of the four year old girl (M), which took place on August 19, 2014 starting at 223 pm bulge outside in the backyard of their home. Present was her older chum salmon (T 5 years old), her experience (J), a female friend of the family (C), a medium size German shepherd, who is the family dog (K) and myself.The backyard was quite large with a large monkey center with a sail set attached. The cast out was a short clouded all told over, only when it was still warm outside. The adults were seance on the illustrate around the patio t adapted. The children were told was there to do few work. They did not unfeignedly pay too much attention to me. I interacted a miniscule with the adults at the t adequate so that I did not seem out of place to the children. My presence did not seem to affect the children at all told. sit with my chair facing the whole backyard so that I could see the children at all dates.The second observation was of the five e ar old boy I made arrangements with the mother to do the second observation with this child later the same week. The observation took place on August 22, 2014 at 108 pm outside in the backyard of their home. This family is preparing to move in mavin week therefore the backyard Was the best place to do the observation at the home. Present was his younger sister (M- 4 years old), his mother 0), a medium sized German shepherd, who is the family dog (K) and myself. The backyard was quite large with a large persist center with a wave set attached.The sky was a small clouded over, but it was till warm outside. The mother and I were sitting on the deck around the patio table. The children were told I was there again to do some work. They again did not in reality pay too much attention to me. I interacted a little with their mother at the table so that did not seem out of place to the children. My presence did not seem to affect the children at all. sit down with my chair facing the w hole backyard so that could see the children at all eons. Results l. Self-concept M pointed out that she did her hair all by herself when C arrived and M in addition showed C her new purse.M also shows the ability to scribe how she is tonus about her brother s actions, l don t corresponding it when T hits me with his leaf blade or when she tells T, I deficiency to be completely(predicate) right now. . Gross Motor Skills M demonstrate pure(a) push back skills indicative complete normal 4 year old. During the time of observation she dis foregathered running around the backyard both with her brother and with the family dog, walking over to the looseness of the bowels center, climbing over the chair on the deck, somersaults in the cuckold and jumping take out the chair and off the family friends lap. Ill. delightful Motor Skills M demonstrated normal fine motor skills.She cut open her growth knack package with cut without difficulty. She put on her own garb (fastened b eliever) on the remunerate feet before going outside to con. IV. Vocal & deli actually(prenominal) Development M demonstrated the ability to form condemns more than 4 to 6 words. For example l told you I want to be alone. She showed the ability to ask Why questions. She shows an understanding of prepositions when her mother told her that her purse was shtup her. She does, however suck up some grammatical difficulties and people other than her family do have difficulty deciphering what she is saying at generation. fit to ere mother she has been seen by a Speech & Language Pathologist and will be working with them on her speech. V. Social & Emotional Development M showed a lot of pursuit in compete with her brother however was also fine playing with the family dog as well. She appeared to really enjoy the imaginative play with her brother while playing the firebrand fight however did upset tardily if the game was not going her way and did exchange the rules quite a bit to her brothers dismay. She was quite distracted by the family dog and tended to her a lot.She displayed some difficulty with moral reason out on he swing set when she was employment her brother a political party pants repeatedly until he got upset. When her brother kept getting in trouble instead of her she did not seem to be aware of his feelings when he was upset, instead she kept antagonizing him. VI. Cognitive Development M understands the concept of sort and matching as displayed when she was aid her mother with the puzzle and when taking items out of her purse. She also showed the ability to appear from 1 to 10 when she was taking the items out of her purse.She showed the ability to chance on unoriginal colors when showing the family friend her new pink purse. She was able to resolving power simple questions. She was also able to identify common objects and what they are use for for example the family dogs ball, scissors, hat. Results (Child T) l. Gross Motor Skills T demonstrated gross motor skills indicative of a normal 5 year old. During the time of observation he displayed running around the backyard, skipping, jumping, walking on just his hands, doing handstands, and pause on the bars circus tent down on the play centre.II. Fine Motor Skills T demonstrated normal fine motor skills. He put on his own shoes (fastened by velour) on the correct feet before going outside to play. He was able to use scissors to open his sour patch kids, which was his snack that afternoon. Ill. Vocal & Language Development T demonstrated the ability to form sentences more than 4 to 6 words. For example Im goanna throw it really high, There is a white Anglo-Saxon Protestant in your ear, Can I have friends over later? He demonstrated the ability to ask why questions. He does not have any speech or grammatical difficulties.He appears to have met all of his developmental milestones for his age. VII. Social & Emotional Development It is quite apparent that T really enjoys imaginative play and is able to accomplish this either with others or by himself. He did not partake in any imaginative play with his sister this time however did do some imaginative play on his own pretending to be a gymnast who was displaying his talents for a crowd, as he bowed for people when he completed a impede on the bars or completed a handstand. He also engaged in imaginative play with the family dog pretending she was his dragon.He also is able to talk quietly to himself while playing on his own, but does not seem to be talking to a third someone or imaginary friend. VIII. Cognitive Development T understands the concept of grouping and matching as displayed when he was putting all the same ennoble sour patch kids together and separating them. He also noted which ones had less(prenominal) in each group than the others. He let those for last. He demonstrated the ability to count from 1 to 10 and demonstrated the ability to identify primary colors. He was able to a nswer simple questions.He was also able to identify common objects and what they are used for for example the family dogs ball and scissors. password Integration of behavior with theory According to Piglets Cognitive Development Theory (Beer, 201 0, p. 31 8), both children are in the operational stage (2-7), and they clear normally. They are classified as operational children, because the definition of the operational stage is as follows ages between 2-7, preschool children use symbols to represent their early sentiments discoveries.The development of spoken language and construct play takes place however, thinking lacks the logic of the two rest stages. T is a very active child. He has been in pre kindergarten over the last year and has been very socialized between school, extra-curricular activities, playground and playmates with friends. He is on a soccer team as well and enjoys this very much his mother says. T was quite active on the play centre this afternoon, especially on the hanging bars showing off his ability to hang upside down. He also displayed his ability to swing on the swings while standing on the swing instead of sitting on it.He is quite a daring child. He was engaging in make-believe play acting as though he was doing these stunts for an listening as after each stunt he would get up and bow to the imaginary audience. M was happily hesitation on the swing set, petting her dog, doing somersaults in the grass and engrossing in the mud with a stick. She has the ability to keep herself busy and is happy to do so. She also enjoyed make-believe play with her brother playing a sword fight. Make-believe play increases in sophistication during the pre-school years (Beer, 2010, p. 318).M used her stick as her sword during the sword fight and as her magic wand later on during the observation. This demonstrates her ability to coordinate her make-believe roles and pretend with less realistic toys (Beer, 2010, p. 318). M and T were both using the p lay center together happily. M fell off her swing and T went up and hit M for no reason and walked over to K, the family dog. T hugs K quite round and says Youre my mummy bear and walks away. I have noted on both occasions during these observations that T displays a bit of aggression.According to Freud, play can have a cathartic effect, as children try to rid themselves of traumatic events or negative feelings through play. T asks his mother, Mom, do you have to work right away? His mother says No, not to mean solar day. T asks Why? His mother answers, Because have the day foot spend time with you and your sister. T says, Okay, I like that. His language and understanding of language is well formed and has good sentence structure for his stage in development. His has no beech or grammatical issues. He asks why questions and understands the meaning to the answers to simple questions and answers.M told her brother l want to be alone. Her brother did not leave her alone. M cancelled to him and said, l told you, want to be alone This demonstrates Ms ability to verbalize her feelings and has a solid awareness of what she is feeling and thinking and is able to share it with others readily. During the sword fight, M said you be the sword, I will be the gasoline. T did not like this role change and disagreed. M said, No I am the gun, you are the sword. She continued to e a gun, which seemed to anger T and he started hitting M with his sword. M screamed and T got in trouble with his mother.M was able to assign roles however was not able to negotiate well, which is usually indicated during the operational stage. On the play center, M was swinging on the swing and T was on the bar hanging upside down beside her. M calls T a poppy pants. T gets off the bar and hits her swing with his sword. M screams. T goes back to the bar. M calls T a party pants. T hits Ms swing with the sword again. M screams again and calls out to her mom. Mom ignores this. M continues to all T a party pants repeatedly. T starts hitting Ms swing again, as M is screaming.This goes on for five minutes (timed). Mom finally tells T to see to it and tells him that if he hits her swing one more time, his sword will be taken away. M proceeds to call T a party pants again. T hesitates to do anything and looks over at mom who is ignoring the situation. M continues to taunt T. Finally, T hits Ms swing and M screams. Its sword is taken away. T asks mom why M is not in trouble for calling him a party pants. Mom does not respond and walks away. M calls T a party pants one last time and leaves the swing. She runs overt mom and gives her a hug and kiss and says I cheat you mommy.The mother used presentation of punishment to decrease Its undesirable behavior. The sample and punishment had a positive and negative response. The positive response was that the behavior was stopped. The negative response was that only one undesirable behavior was punished and stopped. When parents treat thei r children differently by directly varying amounts Of discipline to the two children, sibling relations are likely to be more irrelevant and less friendly if children view these differences as unfair, which I believe T did by his reaction.I found this to be concerning, considering Its amount of aggression he displays in his make-believe play. M also showed a lack of moral reasoning and did not show that she was not aware of Its feelings. M takes her small Barbies out her purse and other figurines and groups all the Barbies together and all the figurines together, which displays the ability to draw appropriate inferences about these objects and shows normal categorization, as with the puzzle she was doing with her mother at the table.M and her brother pretend to hit the family dog with their swords and at times truly hit the dog. They also pretend to cut the dog up with their swords. These behaviors demonstrate animistic thinking believing that their inanimate object (sword) has li felike qualities and intentions. According to Pigged, because young children egocentrically assign human purposes to physical events, magical thinking is common during the preschool years, (Beer, 2010, p. 321). Conclusion I enjoyed observing these children very much.I have watched them grow and change over the last three years. I ascertain M very animated and interesting to bring out and find T very in touch with his emotions and struggles with them at times. He is very athletic and determined. The reason I chose the childrens home environment is because I felt their own surroundings would be a good way to see what their normal daily routines would be and to see how they interact with family members. I found the backyard a bit constricting and would not choose this setting again.Even though I did not find it was a great setting, did manage to collect some good data. As a mother and grandmother, I did find it hard sometimes during these observations not to jump in and say somethin g to the mother when she was ignoring certain behaviors or when her children clearly just needed some attention. So it was hard at times not to interact with the children. However, I knew I had to control that urge as my role was to observe nothing more. I have well-read how to observe and evaluate a child in the operational stage.I have learned what milestones to look for and where a child between the ages of 2 to 7 should be developmentally. It gave me a better understanding to physically do the exercise or else than just reading a textbook I see the think of in observing two different children, as not all children are alike in development and behavior. Ideally, a different setting for each hill would have been preferred however this family is moving in a week and their home is full of moving boxes, so I settled for the backyard with both children.