Marxist Perspective About the Family

Discuss the Marxist Perspective on the Family The Marxist feminists use Marxist concepts to explain their belief that the family is actually leading to the exploitation of women. Women grant certain roles in the family which bent being paid by the political science and the Marxist feminists see this as women atomic number 18 getting abused. Such roles are the caring of their children, attending needs of the husband and serve as an emotional galosh-valve for the husband from the frustration of work. Friedrich Engels (1884) traces the origins of the family and the evolution of the family through time.He argues that as the mode of drudgery change, so does the family. The early stages of human evaluation states that the means of production where communally owned, such the family, did not exists. Individuals lived in groups which were characterized by promiscuity. There were no rules restrain sexual relationships and therefore the community was like a 1 boastful whole family. Ano ther Marxist who argues that the family is instrumental to the capitalist economy is Eli Zaretsky (1976).He believed that that the family was otiose to provide physiological and personal needs which allow the proletariat (workers) to share with the pressures of capitalism. The family aerates the illusion that private life of the family is separate from the economy but in actual fact, the family is supporting capitalism by producing future workers for the capitalists, consuming the products of the capitalists. therefore this allows the capitalists to keep the profits up. For Zaretsky the family is a major problem to the capitalist economy.The socialising in the Marxist view is that the family socializes children into accepting values of capitalism, which to be take in with the status/level within hierarchy. The bourgeois nuclear family emerged with capitalism, this leads to the patriarchal cause of male to be dominating the inheritance property. Women, on the opposite side, woul d be power little for any decisions to be made within the family but moreover to obey. Females would have more domestic work at home whilst males are working, communicating and socializing more outside.They rear children and look after their husbands callable to the non-costly domestic works/choirs. Families also act as a safety valve toward those bourgeoisie men, which diverts their stress, anger and frustration. Meanwhile, Marxists also state their perspective of males would be less likely to go on strike throughout families play an meaning(a) role to take responsibilities of them. As in unit of consumption, families consume goods and work that provided by the capitalism. The Marxist view doesnt take in part of the family variety show they believe that the nuclear family is determined by our economy.As a conclusion to this, we dismiss say that the nuclear family didnt actually coincide with the emergence of the capitalism. We bathroom also say the Marxist view ignores famil y diversity and it sees the nuclear family as being simply determined by the economy. Marxist approaches often fill the existence of a traditional model of the nuclear family and may hyperbolise the harm done to women by families. They tend to portray women as the still victims of capitalist and patriarchal exploitation. Marxist disregards positive aspects in family life.